Posts Tagged With: television writing

How NOT to introduce a character

“In closing, […] screenwriters — you need to chiggity check yo’selves before you wreck yourselves.” “#betheFUCKINGChange”
―@mysteryexec (Twitter)

**Oh ye of sensitive dispositions: I apologize in advance for the all swearing in this post. It is necessary.**

A while back (almost a year ago) the sage @mysteryexec of Twitter fame went on a bit of a rant:

“pretty without pretense or solicitation” “pretty without trying” — If you have this as character description you are a BAD, LAZY WRITER.

STOP WRITING FEMALE CHARACTERS AS FUCK PUPPETS. YOU ARE ALL BAD WRITERS. ALL OF YOU.

TALK TO ACTUAL WOMEN. MALE WRITERS, YOU ARE ALL DOING IT WRONG.

HAVE A WOMAN READ YOUR FUCKING SCRIPT AND CALL YOU OUT ON YOUR AWFUL FUCKING DIALOGUE.

“She’s quirky”. NO SHIT!!! WE BETTER GET ZOOEY GODDAMN DESCHANEL ON THE LINE RIGHT FUCKING NOW!!! LAZY LAZY LAZYYYYY.

“It’s stylized,” you argue. NO. IT IS SHIT. NO WOMEN TALK LIKE THIS YOU FUCKING HACK.

THE FACT THAT REPS BRING THIS SHIT TO ME IS EQUALLY EMBARRASSING.

So sayeth the Lord of the Mystery Twitter Accounts.  Amen.

However, again almost a year later, I am still seeing this crap in the scripts I read.  “The only thing prettier than her face is her ass.” “Her eyes were clear blue gems in a porcelain face.” (also – present tense people, please.)  “Girl-next-door looks with a not so sweet mind.”  Yes these are real.  But you see the problem.  Besides being pretty awful, they also tell me NOTHING about the character.

Now I admit, I was guilty of this until the amazing ladies at Script Chix (http://scriptchix.com/ shout out to Miranda Sajdak) hit me over the head and pointed out that I wasn’t any better.  I take solace in the fact I was doing it to both male and female characters, though that doesn’t make me a better writer, only a less misogynistic one.  But it is totally and completely lazy.  Here’s a piece of advice from the Script Chix: Hollywood does not hire actors who are not good-looking.  Therefore it is entirely redundant to specify in the script that they are good looking.  It’s a given.  It doesn’t tell us WHO the character is.  And on a smaller soapbox, it limits casting.  Is it important that your heroine is blonde?  Is it important that your hero has green eyes?  Of course not.  I tried to argue once that it was, actually, important to my character that she was pretty and that it influenced who she was as a person.  But the way to go about that was not to talk about how beautiful she was.  It was to show how she acted in the scene.  I’m sure “show don’t tell” has been beaten into your brain enough by now, but it’s as true for character descriptions as it is for anything else.

Look at some screenplays from writers you admire (I’m not going to compile a list for you, that’s what research is for) and pay attention to the descriptions.  As John August says, “Look for details that have an iceberg quality: only a little bit sticks above the surface, but it represents a huge mass of character information the reader can fill in.”  Think simple, think memorable, think beyond hair color and ass shape.

First impressions are forever, make sure yours don’t suck.

Categories: Uncategorized | Tags: , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Friends on TV

“In a very real way, television is the new mythos. It defines the world, reinterprets it. The seasons do not change because Persephone goes underground. They change because new episodes air, because sweeps week demands conflagrations and ritual deaths. The television series rises slowly, arcs, descends into hiatus, and rises again with the bright, burning autumn.”
―Catherynne Valente

 

The Social Surrogacy Hypothesis sounds like an episode of The Big Bang Theory (actually it IS the name of my BBT spec, so don’t steal it), but in reality this is a very real phenomenon of psychology which says that people can form social attachments to their favorite television characters.  This research is supposedly proves why Friends really feel like your friends.  Or why someone (don’t know who, just someone, no one in particular, stop looking at me) would vow to never watch Lost again week after week as their favorite characters are methodically killed off, only to return like a moth to a bright screen.  And then repeat that with Grey’s Anatomy and then again with Game of Thrones even though I had already read the books and totally knew those people were about to die horribly.  But this isn’t about me.  I think.

This parasocial element of television has helped “Who shot JR?” and “Joanie loves Chachi” and “Yadda yadda yadda” become an ingrained part of our culture.  Studies have shown that people feel less lonely, less sad, less afraid, when their television is on.  And this is a GOOD thing.  Of course shunning the outside world to watch reruns of Gillian’s Island is probably going too far.  But, though it seems crazy, it is perfectly normal to get caught up in the imaginary lives of the Gallaghers of South Side Chicago or the Starks of Winterfell.

However, the sense of belonging, which can buffer a negative mood and even increase self-esteem, is part of the reason we love television so much.  It’s why we keep returning even though they killed off Charlie, why we cheer for Alicia even when she does something a little scummy, why we may or may not have cried just a little bit when Cam and Mitchell got married, and why if Daryl dies we riot.

So what does this mean for us as writers? (after all this is a writing blog)  It means television is all about the characters.  We start watching because of the hook, but we return because of the characters.  So when you’re working on that new pilot and thinking about your story engine and all the little plot points that will allow the series to get to episode 100, remember, it all starts and ends with the characters.  I’ll be posting a little more on television in the weeks to come, so tune in (har har.) to get some tips and trick on starting that pilot or spec.

Because admit it, you totally squealed like an eighth-grade girl when Sheldon kissed Amy.

Categories: Uncategorized | Tags: , , , , | Leave a comment

Everyone’s a critic

“Critics sometimes appear to be addressing themselves to works other than those I remember writing.”
―Joyce Carol Oates

It is easy for writers, or anyone really, to get their hackles up at the slightest provocation.  But criticism is part of the job description.  You need thick skin.  Like alligator/armadillo/dragon hide.  Because you are going get butt-hurt at some point, whether you’re trying to be cool or not, you will.  It’s part of being creative.  The real test of your professionalism is how you take it.  The most important thing to know is that if you can’t learn to listen to the criticism, not only will you not grow as a writer, you will also never work as a writer.

A bedtime story for you all:

I was contacted a while back to work on a script adaptation of a self-published book.  The author was highly interested (who wouldn’t be?) in having their book adapted, however they felt the book had been written in such a way that there was no real work to be done; one could simply type the book into screenwriting software and voila! a marketable script.  This is not the case. Ever.  Even the best, most highly regarded best seller are adapted, cut, stitched, changed and generally destroyed in order to make a film.  It’s just the nature of the game (more on adaptations later, that’s a post for another time).  However, this author was having none of it.  I could feel the pushback almost immediately and so wanted to make sure he would be okay with the changes before I did substantial work.  I should note, at the time we did not have the book rights.  That is a huge mistake.  Always get the book rights first then you don’t have to go through what I went through.  So I gently suggested minor changes first, building up to the larger ones.  Nope.  He had really thought these characters, scenes, horrible cliché-ridden plot points through and just couldn’t understand why I would change one word.  After months of back and forth, I bowed out.  His book has not found a publisher and probably won’t be a movie any time soon.  Know why?  Of course you do.  He couldn’t take the criticism.

Fast forward.

I’m contacted to do another adaptation.  First draft goes out and comes back with major revisions.  Know what I did?  Of course you do.  I MADE THE REVISIONS.  Because in the end, in this business, you have to adapt.  Stand your ground for the things that matter and let the other stuff roll off your back.  Take the criticism.

 

Which brings me to feedback.  Inevitably someone will some day ask you to give them feedback on their writing.  You should do it.  It’s great practice and reading more scripts, any scripts, will improve your own writing as you will start to be able to tell when things are working and when they are not.  Even better, you’ll learn to give notes which will someday help you take them too.  But friendly feedback is different from studio notes, therefore you should not tell your writer how to fix things, but rather give them an impression of how different elements feel and leave the fix up to them.  I.e. the dialogue is wrong vs. the beat felt rushed.  See the difference?

In the end, once you slough off that newbie layer of naivety and ego, you’ll be able to tell the worthwhile criticism from the trash.  They are both out there, and believe me when I tell you, EVERY piece of writing could use some improvement.  Though once you realize that, the trick will become knowing when to stop.

But that’s also a post for another time.

 

Categories: Uncategorized | Tags: , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.